On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 01:13:37PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote: > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > Reviewing an ebuild has nothing to do with inclusion. For inclusion in > > the tree, it also needs to be tested. > > You don't take the slightest look at an ebuild (the code) before > including it? Anyhow, whether its testing or code review, it is time > better spent than cooking up conspiracy theories about me vs. the games > team and posting it to the mailing list. Bleh, word play/<this> isn't needed, as spanky said it's a waste.
Inclussion == commit to the tree, available via rsync. Review, and testing are both required. ~harring
pgp8UTwCj68nk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
