maillog: 19/08/2005-02:59:46(+0000): Luke-Jr types > On Thursday 18 August 2005 17:01, Georgi Georgiev wrote: > > vanilla - Do not add extra patches which change default behaviour > > For features, I would expect individual USE flags-- what if I want one patch, > but not another?
I agree. Fine-grained control is nice, but I also like the idea of being able to refuse all non-upstream patches that change default behaviour. Similarly to what mutt is doing: !vanilla? ( nntp? ( .... ) some other patches that have no useflag ) > For changing mere defaults, a "gentoo" USE flag seems like it would make > sense. -- \ Georgi Georgiev \ Alcoholics Anonymous is when you get to \ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / drink under someone else's name. / \ +81(90)2877-8845 \ \
pgpX20TBZKZ5r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
