On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:05:43PM +0200, Grobian wrote:
> 
> 
> Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >>Bah! No I'm not, because Sven pointed out that it collides with the
> >>bugzilla resolution. So I'm going with CHECKED instead.
> >
> >Whoah! Isn't REVIEWED the perfect keyword?
> >
> 
> or APPROVED?

I think APPROVED doesn't reflect the idea; since nobody 'approved' the
ebuild. A developer just checked it looks good and 'seems to work'.
REVIEWED or CHECKED make more sense imho.

Cheers,
Ferdy

-- 
      \\|// . . .  o  o o  o  O  O   (   Born to be   )
       o o                           (      FREE      )
+--ooO--O--Ooo-----------------------------------------------+
| Fernando José Pereda Garcimartín - http://www.ferdyx.org   |
| Gentoo Linux Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferdy      |
| [ ferdy AT ferdyx DOT org ] && [ ferdy AT gentoo DOT org ] |
|     20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED  ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4     |
+------------------------------------------------------------+

Attachment: pgp7ybycy98a9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to