On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:05:43PM +0200, Grobian wrote: > > > Maurice van der Pot wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >>Bah! No I'm not, because Sven pointed out that it collides with the > >>bugzilla resolution. So I'm going with CHECKED instead. > > > >Whoah! Isn't REVIEWED the perfect keyword? > > > > or APPROVED?
I think APPROVED doesn't reflect the idea; since nobody 'approved' the ebuild. A developer just checked it looks good and 'seems to work'. REVIEWED or CHECKED make more sense imho. Cheers, Ferdy -- \\|// . . . o o o o O O ( Born to be ) o o ( FREE ) +--ooO--O--Ooo-----------------------------------------------+ | Fernando José Pereda GarcimartÃn - http://www.ferdyx.org | | Gentoo Linux Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferdy | | [ ferdy AT ferdyx DOT org ] && [ ferdy AT gentoo DOT org ] | | 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 | +------------------------------------------------------------+
pgp7ybycy98a9.pgp
Description: PGP signature