On Thursday 18 August 2005 01:28 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Thursday 18 August 2005 19:19, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > ok, but then you still have the fact that you're writting an eclass for a > > single function ... isnt that the point of eutils ? > > A part eutils being polluted, when pmake is used directly with bsd-style MK > definitions, bsdmk take care of most of it. > That's why an eclass.
then why not think bigger ... call it 'bsdeutils' or something rather than limiting yourself to bsd make -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
