On Monday 15 August 2005 04:19 pm, Stefan Jones wrote: > On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 15:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > But first I have an idea to only use scanelf (but that may have issues > > > with 32/64 combined userspaces) which I would want to implement. > > > > no, it doesnt ... scanelf can handle any ELF format regardless of > > endian/bitsize of the host or target or any combo thereof > > > > you can scan 32bit MSB ARM ELF's from a host 64bit LSB X86_64 host just > > as easily as say from a 32bit MSB PARISC host > > Sorry, was not clear enough, a 32bit library cannot resolve a 64bit > dependency. So when you read in the available libraries and there > dependencies you need to keep track of which type they are.
i debated adding a flag for that once and ended up with a 'not now, but maybe someday' > Anyway, the -i flag to scanelf fixes that and other issues, just group > all the data from scanelf by interpreter (so have multiple hashes, one > for each interp). yeah, that might be a better idea anyways ... after all, we dont want to limit our concept of different co-existing ABI's to just 32bit/64bit also, you may want to use -F to control the output rather relying on the default output order -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
