On Thursday 11 August 2005 00:39, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 11:24 am, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 22:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:10:39 -0400 Michael Cummings > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > | (not directed at dsd in particular, just the last one in my inbox > > > | to reply :) That's great and all that its in features for the > > > | installation, but what about packages with optional dependencies > > > | based on doc and man? > > > > > > Join in the quest to get FEATURES added to the expand list! Bug > > > #82513. > > > > How much do you like C code that has > > #ifdef's for the compiler being used? It's the same thing. > > i'll take > #ifdef __x86_64__ > over > use amd64 > any day
I was referring to compiler version. Portage FEATURES are not a guaranteed part of an ebuild's "shell". Let me put it another way, should ebuilds handle NOCOLOR as well? -- Jason Stubbs
pgp6wvR66UYHW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
