> Yep, you're a heretic. :)
> How would you propose that DEPEND information make it's way up the
> portage stack, and ultimately affects the depgraph?
>
> What you're suggesting is effectively "suggested" deps, which are a
> bit backwards considering we have "optional" deps, the 8 flags you
> dislike :)

Let me follow up with that I'm all for adding the use flags IF other packages 
would make use of them as well.  I just really hate adding 8 local use flags 
for this pretty heavily used package that won't add much utility to anything 
else and will add a bit of headache to making sure Qt is installed with all 
of the bells and whistles the end user wants. :)
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to