So... profile.d have future on Gentoo? If yes, any idea on when this will become part of baselayout. Please, I'm not compelling... just curious.
On 7/18/05, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > | On Monday 18 July 2005 07:47 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > | > |>Mike Frysinger wrote: > |>| can we get you to actively remove the file then ? or move it into the > |> > |>docs > |> > |>| dir as like an example file, xprint.profile.d > |> > |>OK, all the ebuilds are putting them as docs now. If anyone actually > |>uses xprint and it breaks, let me know. > | > | > | i dont see how it would seeing as how nothing uses profile.d :) > > You wouldn't believe the weird crap that goes on with xprint. There > could be another file somewhere else that sources it and relies on it, > or something else even stranger. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFC3ETvXVaO67S1rtsRArA7AJ9bpoVd4oOx7uXoaYgeiMIKvuRQ6gCg3XWM > QXan/3t0KPS63DdDXhUhNeI= > =nFS0 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
