Recent thread on vpopmail had a few developers make this comment (quoting robbat2):
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] VPopmail - SUID vchkpw >In the absence of a proper QA team, users are some of the best >large-scale QA available. All I'm asking for are reports that a package >"Works for me". Try the ebuilds out, and send some feedback in. I can't speak for other developers or herd maintainers, but if you have been using a perl package that is ~arch masked and think its as good as it gets, please file a 'bug' on bugzilla saying so. I've seen folks lately doing it for amd64 keywording - yay! But we also need that kind of feedback for mainstream keywording. Otherwise we get into the situation that any dev has faced - you have a package ~arched, you use it for a month or three, no problems, but then it languishes in ~arch land because you don't have the gentle reminder that others think its ready for prime time too. I guess the drift I'm trying to making (and why I separated this out from that longer thread) is to encourage the folks on this list, being a development list and all, to please post on bugzilla for both the good and the bad of any ~arch package your using - any feedback helps us churn out a newer Gentoo for you faster ;) Thanks for lending me your ears, collections is at the rear of the store, ~mcummings
pgpvAOZOMwNLa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
