-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

R Hill wrote:
> Ah, okay.  You're talking about patch review.  Now this makes sense.
> I've always considered the Verified status to be indicative that a third
> party has been able to reproduce the bug, not that a fix has been
> "approved".  My mistake.

No problem; I appreciate your input. I think Chris White's (et. al.)
recent work on the documentation is going to have a better effect on the
problem you mention.

Nathan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFC0Z832QTTR4CNEQARAlxWAJwIkswVeLsJlSfcVmcTGcjaBGAKZACghI0b
eqbYsXXyTLxJhyf8YhEH/VI=
=R/2Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to