-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 R Hill wrote: > Ah, okay. You're talking about patch review. Now this makes sense. > I've always considered the Verified status to be indicative that a third > party has been able to reproduce the bug, not that a fix has been > "approved". My mistake.
No problem; I appreciate your input. I think Chris White's (et. al.) recent work on the documentation is going to have a better effect on the problem you mention. Nathan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC0Z832QTTR4CNEQARAlxWAJwIkswVeLsJlSfcVmcTGcjaBGAKZACghI0b eqbYsXXyTLxJhyf8YhEH/VI= =R/2Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list