On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 11:47 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Saturday 09 July 2005 11:28, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > However, if an ebuild chooses to run make directly for some unknown reason > > or use some specific tool to unpack an unsupported file format, the package > > should really be explicit about its dependency. > And this let me think: we'll be able sooner or later to specify 'gmake' > instead of make to avoid having aliases magic on G/FBSD systems? :)
I still this this is a bsd issue, so some or other solution which do not include having gmake (and then later lots of other symlinks/whatever) should be installed system wide for only a very small portion of our user segment on all systems. If its portage side only, fine. If I am missing something, my apologies - I am just making my stance clear. Thanks, -- Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
