On Wednesday 06 July 2005 07:06 pm, Roy Marples wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 15:46 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > Ok, now that devfs is removed from the 2.6 kernel tree[1], I think it's > > time to start to revisit some of the /dev naming rules that we currently > > are living with[2]. > > > > > > [2] devfs vs. udev flames will dutifully be ignored. Give up, it will do > > You no good to argue. > > My understanding was that we still support old 2.2 kernels for SPARC > users as eradictor (iirc) posted a patch that only allowed iproute2 > support if the kernel supported it. 2.6 kernels support it by default - > were require /proc/net/netlink for iproute2.
and eventually i'd like to get m68k into the 2.2 kernels ... > This has absolutely zero to do with udev, but the point is that devfs vs > udev "flames" cannot be ignored until non udev supported kernels from > all arches are removed from the tree. i dont see how 2.2 kernels matter since they dont even support devfs ? -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
