On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 07:35 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On that note.. Would you mind compiling it one time with a gcc built 
> with +boundschecking and then enabling CFLAGS+= -fbounds-checking as a
> basic q/a check. Reason being that if nobody has ever included it
> anywhere the chances of it being audited are slim to none and
> -fbounds-checking helps ferret out alot of common coding mistakes.
> gcc-3.4.4 works good for this.

I am still on gcc-3.3.x - will that work for this test?

Sincerely,
Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to