On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:48:51AM -0400, Jon Portnoy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:28:20PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:19:34PM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: > > > > I still don't see *WHY* you should be different from us. If you want to > > > > manage your recruits then they can't be gentoo staff. > > > > > > One reason could be that we are _not_ going to be called developers but > > > staff. > > > > Can anybody explain me the difference between them ? > > > > > > Arch teams have developed a new 'figure', the arch tester. Not official > > > > gentoo staff but somehow involved with us; arch teams manage their own > > > > arch tester recruitment process. If that's the situation you want then > > > > they won't become gentoo staff. > > > > > > Didn't I say that was already agreed with devrel? > > > > Do I have to quit saying that I think that's wrong? No thanks. You are > > the only group that will make new devs apart from devrel. I still don't > > see why you should deserve a different treatment. > > > > > AFAIK they still plan to go through devrel, just add a forums person to > the recruiters team so existing recruiters aren't flooded with new staff > all of a sudden
OK, I take that back, plans were dropped for a forums-specific recruiter and instead it'd all go through the existing recruiters Either way, my point stands 8) -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
