-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Daniel Drake wrote: >Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote: > >>That said, we're not RedHat. We ship as MANY features as we can and let >>the user decide. I agree that it is valuable to get reiser4 testing done >>up front. Eventually - some people will use it. Last I checked "I think >>$FOO is stupid" wasn't a valid closure code in bugzilla ;-) > > >Then you have different views from the kernel project :) > >We and try and make our kernel (gentoo-sources) _more_ stable than the >official Linux releases. We mainly stick to bug fixes decreed worthy by the >upstream developers, etc. We never include patches when we know of problems >that they will introduce. > >Daniel i know this has been said before many many times, but i really can't wait until i can see reiserfs4 in a "stable" kernel (vanilla or gentoo) but i doubt that the gentoo-sources crew is going to budge [whining]please.. USE flag'd reiser4? please pretty please[/whinning] Anyways, I can understand the hesitence for the kernel project to add things that have so many possibilties of problems like reiserfs4.. But for me its stable enough that I've only had to run reiserfsck once, and that was right after i set it up, and i had a powerloss.. i ended up just mkreiser4'ing and starting over because it was before i even unpacked a stage.. Anyways, Sorry that this wasnt in gentoo-user, Regards, Andrew -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCtIhAphOMdPLugR4RApBEAKDTV1G40VuPiP5OfVdc0YbezIZF8QCgn/sF e9s+42bIyQ0e+J/4UXchN20= =pqyn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
