-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/10/2005 08:44 AM, Duncan wrote:
> To me, that's a valid link, one that Gentoo should be proud of. In > deleting that page, it's as if we are trying to wash away some part of our > past, "the bad old days", that we are somehow ashamed of. To me, that > just doesn't seem right. I think the intention was to remove everything that wasn't maintainable and didn't have anything to do with politics, but I do agree with you here. That 3 article series is really, really well written and IMHO should not be removed from the site. That said, amybe we can can contact DW and ask for a permalink of sorts? Or if we could mirrior the article on our site? Any other solutions? What this would also probably being up is why the bias towards those 3? - -- Shyam Mani | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> docs-team | http://gdp.gentoo.org GPG Key | 0xFDD0E345 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCqQf/YZNYgP3Q40URAswoAJ4wft1csjuLDZeG8d1ESjl1ZDdaqQCgviJp pZs27+uBq+GRsL5hnhYoebs= =L/ui -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
