On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 02:02 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2005 18:12, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > > This can't be done everytime, and hoping for, in future, having an > > universal eject (libcdio should allow that) I wanted to ask if is possible > > to add a virtual/eject provided by sys-apps/eject and sys-apps/eject-bsd so > > that they can be made dependencies as needed.
> News about this? We really need a solution to this. I'm just curious, but why exactly is a virtual needed? Why can't it be something like: !blah? ( sys-apps/eject ) blah? (sys-apps/eject-bsd ) A virtual is usually reserved for when it affects a large number of packages. If it affects one or two, then simply using some fun *DEPEND syntax usually covers the issue. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
