David Klaftenegger wrote: >>>Why not just create a symlink to the package in the category it *also* >>>should be in? [snip] >>It's a better approach then tagging it into the metadata imo, since it >>forces unique cat/package still. Won't play nice if the tree's fs >>doesn't like symlinks though (fat)... [snip] > Well, instead of a symlink it could also be a textfile containing the > package it points to... but who wants to use a floppy fs for the tree > anyways?
As someone stated on #gentoo-dev, is CVS/rsync happy with symlinks? Or would it need another functionality to Portage to create those links in the "updating cache" phase after sync? -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
