-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2005 16:47:17 -0700 Donnie Berkholz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Heinrich Wendel wrote: > | > I just read this: http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1055 and > | > think it explains things very well. > | > | I blogged [1] about this the other day. It also talks a bit about > | bounties, which I was actually more interested in. > > Which would be even worse, since you'd end up getting cash offered for > silly version bumps and package adds and nothing at all for critical > stuff that the end user doesn't tend to see. Unlike KDE, we have > multiple 'layers' -- we're not just working on directly user visible > applications.
My idea was that the foundation would foot the bounties. It sounds as if you think the users would. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCiVS4XVaO67S1rtsRAnGlAKDrKoEFkfanyg9vewO1vRQ2ynuUbgCgqANv 8E4AnG7wuD8OI6tnSdizBc0= =YW5+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
