On Thursday 05 May 2005 03:28, Michiel de Bruijne wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2005 01:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > For us to support LSB:
> >
> > * We'd have to use RPM instead of portage
>
> That's not correct, quote from LSB:
> "The distribution itself may use a different packaging format for its own
> packages, and of course it may use any available mechanism for installing
> the LSB-conformant packages."
>
> So basically we can continue to do rpm2targz like we do now and still be
> LSB-compliant.

Only if it's wrapped up automatically. At the minimum it would require a 
mapping from lsb dependencies to gentoo dependencies. But yes, we wouldn't 
need to throw portage out. It just needs rpm file support.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

Attachment: pgpG2smq2SQK4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to