On Monday 09 May 2005 02:23 pm, Phil Richards wrote: > On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: > > > > There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in > > > > dev-cpp: > > > > > > dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't > > > categories contain the '+' char? e.g dev-c++? > > > > we did relax the requirement on package names so they can contain '+' in > > them, but i think we should keep our unspoken anal rules about category > > names ... only alphanumeric and a single '-' > > -mike > > Might I suggest dev-cxx? CXX is a fairly common ASCIIfication of C++, > after all.
maybe, but cpp is almost as common and not really worth the hassle of a category rename -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
