On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 03 May 2005 12:10 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > I think an easier solution would be a portage rescue set of profiles. > > afaik the only thing it'd need is a 'make.defaults' and a custom > 'packages' (where we'd force a newer version of portage of course) > > i dont think we even need a set, we could just do it with one ... after all, > we can stick bash code into make.defaults and have it do something ugly like > run `uname` or parse make.defaults to figure out the correct ARCH
If you're feeling up to the bash-fu, I was trying to propose something simple, but this would probably be the best solution. So does anyone have any objections yet? ;] -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
