maillog: 25/04/2005-15:27:12(+0300): Marius Mauch types > Dan Meltzer wrote: > >I can see the use for a category one, but I can see no point for a > >package-local one, if you're going to have it specific for one > >package, why not just put it in the ebuild, and have no eclass at all? > > Actually I'd say the opposite: There is definitely a use for > package-local eclasses, however I don't see the point for category-local > eclasses (especially as that would very funny to get it working). > Example for package-local eclasses? Whenever you define a function in an > ebuild that isn't version specific.
Plus, imagine how much stuff will break when you move a package to a new category. -- *> Georgi Georgiev *> Never underestimate the power of human *> <* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <* stupidity. <* *> +81(90)2877-8845 *> *> -- [email protected] mailing list
