On Wednesday 20 April 2005 23:04, Paul Varner wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:52 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 April 2005 08:27 am, Harald van DÄk wrote: > > > Perhaps > > > make.conf.example (that's provided by portage, right?) should include > > > CBUILD, assuming it doesn't cause problems? > > > > i'm afraid the possibility of users botching this makes it not worth the > > effort > > > > better to keep the definition of CBUILD 'hidden' from most eyes > > As a user, I had the same thought. Why not have portage set it > appropriately unless the user has explicitly defined it? That of course > is making the assumption that someone who has explictly set the CBUILD > variable knows what they are doing, since they had to go through the > trouble of learning about it and the fact that they could set it.
Already done about an hour ago. :) Regards, Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
