On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 20:31, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Saturday 16 April 2005 14:38, Paul Varner wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 06:56 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > > The way I see it, we have three options: > > > - package.mask (downgrades for those early adopters) > > > - keep the same layout (/etc/apache2/conf, etc.) and wait until 2.2 is > > > out to change it > > > - have the newer apache ebuilds migrate from old-style to new-style > > > config (very hard to do, but possible) > > > > As a user whose apache install is completely hosed at the moment due to > > these changes, my recommendation is all the above, with it being package > > masked immediately. > > I disagree. This will actually put you in an inconsistent state as the old > apache overlaps with apr/apr-util. What I think would be the best solution > is to undo the config changes, but keep the apr change in a new ebuild set > that get's updated to (up or downgrading I don't care).
APR and APU are stand-alone and independent of apache, so there is no need to p.mask those libs. Best, Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney http://beu.merseine.nu/ beu/irc.freenode.net http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/ +------------O.o--------------------- http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/pubkey.asc PGP Key ID: 0x69DF17AD PGP Key Fingerprint: DBD3 B756 ED58 B1B4 47B9 B3BD 8D41 E597 69DF 17AD
pgpWUDN7o2VTk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
