On Friday 15 April 2005 22:18, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:14:59 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | If this actually scared anybody (that received it), my apologies. I
> | was confused about bugs. Fixing the flat profiles will be problem
^not^a^
> | either. The bug is that 2.0.50 will die if two profiles in a cascade
> | define the same variable.
>
> Which should be fine, because no-one is even going to *think* about
> wanting sub-profile-specific USE_EXPAND. Right?
USE_EXPAND is not an incremental.
The only other settings that directly relate to ebuilds and currently live in
make.globals are CONFIG_PROTECT and CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK. These should also be
moved into the tree. Any objections?
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
