On Thursday 07 April 2005 01:17, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > I was more talking about the virtual/pam-modules (or whatever). Having > a a PDEPEND is just fine. I was thinking of the virtual for future expansion on NetBSD and other, but this is probably better done using an || PDEPEND when it will be needed.
> > That's a decision up to you as pam mantainers :) > > Anyway I'm available to add the temporary fixes, trace them, and remove > > them when all is done, if needed. > Id rather just do it cleanly. Another solution which could be done "quickly" could be that: - add dependency for the packages which uses include on virtual/pam - provide virtual/pam with pam version 0.78 (and openpam, in my and/or fbsd overlay until it's mature enough to be merged) In this way the dependency could be expressed in a single way which won't need to be fixed in future. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenà http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/
pgp21zEqvEvma.pgp
Description: PGP signature
