On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:02:26PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:04:03 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | You know apple ain't going to support the broken mess that results, > | and nor will we most likely. That is why we can't go replacing > | whatever we label as broken[1] on *any* system where portage is > | secondary. > > Then we can't support portage as a secondary package manager. Well, since you say so... :P
One note, stating that gentoo osx no longer functions with portage as a secondary pkg manager still doesn't do jack for addressing the 10.3 -> 10.4 issue... so really, it still is secondary. ~brian -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
