commit:     b9dc976f43055c1d073c98e5fef77a4d1f94674e
Author:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Fri Oct 28 02:32:43 2022 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Fri Oct 28 02:33:15 2022 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b9dc976f

app-crypt/mhash: actually commit patch

Fixes: dbd2882396b4fd98bec8809d7069bed59eb7aa4c
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo.org>

 .../mhash/files/mhash-0.9.9.9-no-malloc-check.patch  | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/app-crypt/mhash/files/mhash-0.9.9.9-no-malloc-check.patch 
b/app-crypt/mhash/files/mhash-0.9.9.9-no-malloc-check.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6da1f98ac785
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app-crypt/mhash/files/mhash-0.9.9.9-no-malloc-check.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+https://sourceforge.net/p/mhash/patches/11/
+
+Compiling mhash-0.9.9.9 on platforms (like AIX) without GNU libc compatible 
malloc leads to undefined symbol rpl_malloc
+when linking the in-mhash executables drver, frag_test, rest_test, hmac_test, 
keygen_test.
+
+Reason is that configure.in still contains AC_FUNC_MALLOC, detecting need
+to "#define malloc rpl_malloc", while mhash does not provide a rpl_malloc 
implementation.
+
+As the only use of malloc() in lib/stdfns.c does not rely on GNU libc
+compatible malloc actually, there is no need to check for one.
+--- a/configure.in
++++ b/configure.in
+@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ AC_CHECK_HEADERS(signal.h stdint.h stdio.h stdlib.h string.h 
strings.h)
+ 
+ dnl Checks for functions
+ 
+-AC_FUNC_MALLOC
+ AC_FUNC_MEMCMP
+ 
+ AC_CHECK_FUNCS(bcopy bzero)

Reply via email to