commit: 656c8279c5fd1ce6b6f5bfd022d43f1ce0887605 Author: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> AuthorDate: Wed Sep 29 17:00:08 2021 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> CommitDate: Wed Sep 29 17:00:08 2021 +0000 URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/gentoo-news.git/commit/?id=656c8279
2021-09-29-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries: note existing fixes Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo.org> .../2021-09-29-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries.en.txt | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/2021-09-29-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries/2021-09-29-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries.en.txt b/2021-09-29-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries/2021-09-29-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries.en.txt index 5891318..08f3229 100644 --- a/2021-09-29-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries/2021-09-29-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries.en.txt +++ b/2021-09-29-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries/2021-09-29-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries.en.txt @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ new major version, but pax-utils has not yet been upgraded to a version compatible with it (but at that moment stays undetected). The full technical details and investigation can be found on a Wiki page -[0] and on Bugzilla [1]. Work is underway to prevent this happening -again both within Portage [2] (possibly more to come) and within the +[0] and on Bugzilla [1]. Changes have been made to prevent this happening +again both within Portage [7] (with possibly more to come [2]) and within the glibc and pax-utils ebuilds [3][4]. To detect whether a system is affected, emerge the @@ -101,3 +101,4 @@ being affected by system breakage [6] as a result of the bug. [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/811462#c7 [5] https://github.com/thesamesam/recover-broken-vdb [6] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Fix_my_Gentoo +[7] https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=83af7270fafbd7b1eed0031a5e06836ad1edf06d
