Thank you, Justin and all. IIUC, we need a majority +1s for the
release. If there's a -1, the release manager has discretion to cancel
the vote.
Based on Justin's findings, I'm changing my vote to a -1 (IPMC
binding) and canceling this vote.
I'll roll an RC2 shortly.
Thank you.
Best,
Tim
P.S. On jai-imageio-core and Tika see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-304
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 2:01 AM Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for the heads-up. We can fix up the (legacy) test files and remove
> mentions to DigitalPebble as well.
>
> The BSD license w/ nuclear option comes in through the Apache Tika Parser
> Image Module. We don’t actually need that, so we can exclude it on our side
> to remove this license.
> In generel, it sounds like that this kind of license should be followed up
> with Tika than…
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
>
>
> > Am 22.11.2024 um 01:55 schrieb Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry but it -1 (binding) from me jmclean (IPMC)
> >
> > I checked:
> > - incubating in name
> > - signature and hashes are fine
> > - DISCLAIMEr exists
> > - LICENSE is missing 3rd party content, some of which we may not be able to
> > use.
> > - NOTICE is fine
> > - No unexpected binary files
> > - I was unable to complete but probably my setup
> >
> > There are files whose content may not be under an open source license. Do
> > you know how this content is licensed?
> > - ./core/src/test/resources/guardian.rss [1] suggests is only for personal
> > use, which would not apply here [1]
> > - ./core/src/test/resources/digitalpebble.com.html (and a few other files)
> > uses http://digitalpebble.com <http://digitalpebble.com/> is there a
> > commercial interest here? I also note that the README.md also refers to
> > DigitalPebble. Is there a vendor neutrality issue here?
> > - ./core/src/test/resources/longtext.html has an ASF header, but I doubt it
> > was created at the ASF. How is this content licensed?
> >
> > I also note that one of your dependencies is a BSD license with a nuclear
> > disclaimer - wouldn’t this not be compatible with the Apache License?
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Justin
> >
> >
> > 1. https://www.theguardian.com/help/feeds
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
