Hi, > Hi, Justin, about the proposal, we have already mentioned that 'with > the current contributors primarily coming from Xiaomi', and also 'the > majority of core developers working on the OzHera project are salaried > by Xiaomi', which reflects the current status of the project.
Yes, the proposal does make that clear. > And in the discussion thread, the team also mentioned that they have > already attracted some external developers, although the contributions > are not enough to make them initial committers. When I looked at a couple of contributions from external developers, they were pretty simple, and I think at most two commits from a person (but I could have misremembered that and have it wrong). Given the low activity from external people, I understand why you would not make them initial committers, but then also claiming there’s a community of external developers is stretching things a bit. > We hope that during the incubation time the project can build a diverse > community, and > finally successfully graduate and become a TLP. Of course there are > risks that the project fails to do so and can not graduate, but I do > not think this is a blocker for entering the incubator right? Taking up valuable time from Incubator volunteers can be a concern if the project isn't ready to join the incubator. Kind Regards, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
