Yes I understand that is not required, nonetheless changing name later is not ideal. I really love the name OpenServerless, but since there is a risk Serverless.com may object (who trademarked the name "serverless") and develop the serverless framework that is similar in scope, it is better to know the potential issue in advance.
To my understanding, since there are other "serverless something" trademarks, "Apache OpenServerless" should be acceptable, but here we need support from trademark lawyers to be sure. So I opened the issue. Michele Sciabarra | CEO m: +44 747 984 8388 e: mich...@nuvolaris.io l: https://linkedin.com/in/msciab Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street , Wilmington DE www.nuvolaris.io [image: linkedin icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/nuvolaris-io> [image: youtube icon] <http://bit.ly/nuvtube> [image: twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/NuvolarisIo> On Thu, 30 May 2024 at 14:41, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 8:43 AM Francois Papon > <francois.pa...@openobject.fr> wrote: > > ...We need to ask for a search about the project name... > > That's a requirement for exiting incubation, not for entering it, as per > [1] . > > But it's good to have a name that doesn't need to change later, so > checking now doesn't hurt. > > -Bertrand > > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
