Hi PJ,

I agree that there should be a section in podlings' reports that highlights 
<private/> security issues.

Regards,
Craig

> On Dec 13, 2023, at 05:22, PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I'm wondering if podlings should include some details about their
> security issues [1] in their 3 podling reports. We won't want to
> release information about any security issues that are still under
> investigation or where the fix is not yet released. I still think
> there is little harm in podlings giving high level numbers and maybe
> some indication of how quickly security issues are being dealt with.
> 
> I've seen evidence that some TLPs are unaware of the importance of
> dealing quickly with security reports and I think the Incubator team
> could help with ensuring that podlings are aware of the requirements.
> 
> I will certainly be having a close look at a podling's record of
> handling security reports when it comes to discussions about
> graduation.
> 
> I'm wondering if we could have some consensus on what is expected of podlings.
> 
> Regards,
> PJ
> 
> [1] https://www.apache.org/security/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

Craig L Russell
c...@apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to