Hi Jason, What Justin said.
Most projects ask all contributors for ICLAs, but only require them for "significant" contributors. If a contributor is not particularly active and has a few merged PRs then it's ok to use the Apache License 2.0 clause 5. I expect that most of the significant contributors are already listed on the KIE proposal and they are all expected to sign ICLAs. Warm regards, Craig > On Jan 24, 2023, at 07:54, Jason Porter <jpor...@ibm.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Thanks Justin. > > That very well could take some time :) Drools has 215 contributors, jBPM 128, > and Kogito 230. Granted there is a large amount of overlap, but that's a lot > of contributors. > > Jason Porter > Software Engineer > He/Him/His > > IBM > > On Jan 23, 2023, at 19:41, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > HI, > > For KIE, all of the software that will be part of the podling is already > licensed as ASL 2.0. Do we need to have a code grant, or simply pass an IP > clearance? > > While it is under ASL 2.0 a grant would be preferred but not required. All > incubating projects still need to pass IP clearance. What most projects do > itis identify all contributors to the code base and have them, if possible, > sign ICLAs. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > Craig L Russell Assistant Secretary, Apache Software Foundation c...@apache.org <mailto:c...@apache.org> http://db.apache.org/jdo <http://db.apache.org/jdo>
