On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 08:08, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You are right about that, and I think that ultimately could prevent it > from > > happening > > Can you elaborate? > > Suppose Apache Bicycle project takes the current Elm code in a source > form and evolves it. > It should be pretty much possible. > > BSD-3 code may be included in Apache projects. > BSD-3 does not forbid modifications. > Eventually, the newly added files (and completely rewritten ones) > would be licensed under Apache-2. > To elaborate, I was under the impression that copyright ownership of code had to be transferred to Apache, so thinking that is unlikely to happen so would be a deal breaker. But your comments on BSD-3 compatability are illuminating, thanks for the explanation.
