> The first one is include/sys/epoll.h, I think it is a 3 clause BSD license, which is compatible with AL so should not be a big problem but I tried to grep 'epoll.h' in the NOTICE file, I got nothing.
Yes, that's a 3 clause BSD licensed file. We have an entry for it in the LICENSE file: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/blob/master/LICENSE#L722 There are a bunch of others there as well. Regarding the non-source code files you found, we have Kconfig and documentation files that got no license headers on them, are those counted by rat? On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 2:34 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I saw you guys have already removed the DISLAIMER file in the repo. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5910 > > I ran a rat check on the nuttx tarball, and there are still 2569 files with > unapproved license. > I filtered out 778 the .h and .c files without the AL license. > The first one is include/sys/epoll.h, I think it is a 3 clause BSD license, > which is compatible with AL so should not be a big problem but I tried to > grep 'epoll.h' in the NOTICE file, I got nothing. > So I wonder whether we have included all the necessary information in our > NOTICE file. > > I think this is a great step forward. If we could finally make this release > possible without a DISCLAIMER, then it is time for the nuttx project to > graduate! > > Thanks. > > Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> 于2022年4月7日周四 16:26写道： > > > Hello all, > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > > 10.3.0. > > > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to > > release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.3.0. > > > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > > incubator release. > > > > NuttX is a real-time operating system (RTOS) with an emphasis on > > standards compliance and small footprint. Scalable from 8-bit to 64-bit > > microcontroller environments, the primary governing standards in NuttX > > are Posix and ANSI standards. Additional standard APIs from Unix and > > other common RTOS’s (such as VxWorks) are adopted for functionality not > > available under these standards, or for functionality that is not > > appropriate for deeply- embedded environments (such as fork()). > > > > Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity > > involved in the build process. > > > > Apache NuttX community vote and result thread: > > Result: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8rh20pb2t589psk4pq64rjfk756nljbc > > Vote: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/21tkdpnjg9y24onplynt2fnl2hcytjk3 > > > > SCM Information: > > Release tag: nuttx-10.3.0-RC0 > > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: > > c18075779548fcba3f2978689888af8c3b9c959c > > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: > > 4a2aa6d8cffb6eef45d445ca42a3653f700a2565 > > > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.3.0-RC0/ > > [2] > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.3.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes > > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > [4] > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > Alin Jerpelea > > > > Apache NuttX > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
