Hi Hans,
I can get the Dave's concern. These licenses in Category x are always getting
IPMC's attention.
Since I have no clear idea on `fat client` （It needs these licenses?）, but if
no dependencies licensed in category x in this release and onwards, it is
suggested to consider removing them. But, DISCLAIMER-WIP is another story.
Best wish,
Trista
----------------------------------------------------------------
Juan Pan (Trista)
Senior DBA & PMC of Apache ShardingSphere
E-mail: panj...@apache.org
On 04/02/2021 02:19, Hans Van Akelyen wrote:
Hi Dave,
That license has to be removed, no dependencies are LGPL my excuses for the
confusion on that part.
We used to have some that were included in the DISCLAIMER-WIP but they have
been removed between the previous release and now.
Cheers,
Hans
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 20:15, Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi -
>
> You need to avoid required dependencies that are licensed in Category X
> like LGPL. Please review the Legal resolved page. [1]
>
> If Hop is using the DISCLAIMER-WIP you can proceed, but if not then you’ll
> need to remove those.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>
> > On Apr 1, 2021, at 3:22 AM, Hans Van Akelyen <hans.van.akel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are also planning on distributing a "fat client" that contains all
> > dependencies needed to run the application, so we listed all dependencies
> > in
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/blob/master/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/THIRD-PARTY.txt
> >
> >
> > For easy reference we added the license files there to include in the
> > client zip file.
> >
> > As http://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html states that
> > "Convenience binaries need to follow licensing policy" I thought this
> > implies that you also have to list the licenses.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hans
> >
> > On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 12:13, Juan Pan <panj...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> I am curious what the following licenses file existing in
> >> `apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies` are for?
> >> They are different from the licenses in the root directory, aren't they?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-BSD2
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-BSD3
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-CC0
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-CDDL11
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-CPL10
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-EPL10
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-EPL20
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-EXA
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-IBM10
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-LGPL21
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-MPL11
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-MPL20
> >>
> >>
> apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-NCSA
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Juan Pan (Trista)
> >>
> >> Senior DBA & PMC of Apache ShardingSphere
> >> E-mail: panj...@apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 03/30/2021 22:43，Hans Van Akelyen<hans.van.akel...@gmail.com> wrote：
> >> Hi Incubator team,
> >>
> >> We are proud to announce that we have a new release candidate ready for
> >> release and would like your review and vote.
> >>
> >> Build instructions can be found in the README included.
> >>
> >> Hop community vote and result threads:
> >> Vote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r24f1435c891c11d87d20d87d832b5de2613a37cda5e92c3587f058d1%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E
> >> Result:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/red37c2870bd3c366426579ffdd1c33c845eaf13801fd81bc0bd74539%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >> The tag to be voted on is 0.70-rc1 (commit
> >> f16b78f1a16feac5021f4556b30ee0a9609dbc1a)
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.70-rc1
> >>
> >> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.70-incubating-rc1/
> >>
> >> The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
> >>
> >>
> bbf9357801d9bdd0560a6788c7e51d469777d9dbf483be10d67e674552da28848edfba8533bab280afb97949ec55454ec5e147b73ce733010efa57af1997ef3d
> >>
> >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >>
> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e
> >>
> >> For more information about the contents of this release, see:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349578
> >>
> >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70!
> >>
> >> The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if
> >> a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70
> >> [ ] +0 No opinion
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Hans
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
