Hi Justin, Thanks, as always, for the great feedback!
On the PMC, the folks listed fall into at-least one of the following categories - Actively (multiple times a week) taking part in the project. All our newly added PMCs through graduation and majority of original PPMC are currently in this category - Mentors who have helped significantly through the incubation process, teaching us the Apache way - Members of the original PPMC, who may not be very active now, but chose to stay on. These were early adopters/champions for the project. Like you mentioned, the rationale is to allow them the chance to become active again (at-least 1 PMC member cited this specific reason to stay on, On the flip side, we do have 1 PPMC member, 1 inactive mentor who chose to step down and are not part of this list). On the issue of the "person who has been recently added", if this is a mentor, we needed additional mentors, we began a VOTE, but did not follow through, since one of the other mentors suggested apache processes did not require it. Happy to follow up on private@, if thats deemed more appropriate. On the committers, - Of the top 15 contributors [1], 10 of them are already committers. (Not to say this is the only metric). We have a well-documented criteria [2] - We are and will be glad to offer committership to strong contributors. PPMC sends out appreciation emails to such contributors showing strong trajectory and we have such a healthy pipeline working towards committership. We will get the logos/download page link fixed. On the 3rd party branding issues cited, both of them are pre-incubation references to the project when hosted on Uber's github account. One of them is a Spark summit talk delivered by 2 current PMC members (incl me) and ondataengineering.net looks like a 3rd party writing a tech summary on the then Uber OSS project. Since then, Uber has done due process to transfer ownership to the ASF (blog here [3]). Since we incubated, we have consistently used Apache branding in any/all external materials. Please let us know if we are missing something. Thanks Vinoth [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/graphs/contributors?from=2016-12-11&to=2020-05-12&type=a [2] https://hudi.apache.org/community.html#become-a-committer [3] https://eng.uber.com/apache-hudi/ On 2020/05/12 10:50:06, leesf <leesf0...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to graduate Hudi, it is a nice community and deserve graduating. > > Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2020年5月12日周二 上午11:58写道： > > > Hi, > > > > > Why having inactive PMC members is not a big deal now? What's the point > > of > > > keeping them if they r inactive and do nothing or have no interest in the > > > project? > > > > At some point in the future that may become active again or they may plan > > to be more active in the near future. Having a few extra people on the PMC > > doesn’t hurt a project if they are inactive. > > > > > There is an inactive IPMC member on the proposed PMC - who didn't > > > have time, or bandwidth to help in any way on the project but yet chose > > to > > > be part of and expressed his intent to be on the proposed PMC. > > > > I would suggest the project discusses it with them. > > > > BTW I also agree Mentors shouldn't automatically become part of the new > > PMC if they did not help. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
