Transferring my vote from dev@hudi +1 binding
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 12:28 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * mvn clean package from downloaded source successfully > * checked signature and hash > * checked LICENSE/NOTICE - there is a minor issue which should be corrected > in the next release > > According to [1], LICENSE should mention the version of included > dependencies, since their license can also change. > > "NOTE: It's also possible to include the text of the 3rd party license > within the LICENSE file. This is best reserved for short licenses. It's > important to specify the version of the dependency as licenses are > sometimes changed." > > The NOTICE file now has the bundled dependencies bubbled up. I'm not sure > if there was a need to add all of these (though there is no harm). There > appears to be conflicting information in [1]. > > "Under normal circumstances, there is no need to modify NOTICE." > > "If the dependency supplies a NOTICE file, its contents must be analyzed > and the relevant portions bubbled up into the top-level NOTICE file." > > Thanks, > Thomas > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 12:22 AM vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear IPMC, > > > > Apache Hudi (incubating) (pronounced Hoodie) stands for Hadoop Upserts > > Deletes and Incrementals. Apache Hudi (incubating) manages storage of > > large analytical datasets on DFS (Cloud stores, HDFS or any Hadoop > > FileSystem compatible storage) and provide ability to query them. > > > > The Apache Hudi (incubating) community has voted on the release candidate > > and approved. The new source release candidate version is > > 0.5.2-incubating-rc2 > > > > Results: 6 binding +1 votes > > > > Here is the voting > > thread: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7d8b4831666446bdf19fb6365090ad8c5975b5221e66184ccb24b7e2%40%3Cdev.hudi.apache.org%3E > > > > Here is the voting result > > email: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4a43dbb6171b9e1db236246afbc49979e4dcca87b8a09f3de19a2b8%40%3Cdev.hudi.apache.org%3E > > > > The Apache Hudi community had verified the following aspects of release: > > - verified checksums and signatures [SUCCESS] > > - license header check [SUCCESS] > > - No binaries in source release [SUCCESS] > > - verified RAT check [SUCCESS] > > - built from source release (mvn clean install -DskipTests) [SUCCESS] > > - mvn test from source release [SUCCESS] > > > > I'd like to call a vote in general to approve the release of Apache Hudi > > (incubating). Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the > > version 0.5.2, as follows: > > [ ] +1, Approve the release > > [ ] 0, I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: > > * JIRA release notes [1], > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to > be > > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with > > fingerprint C3A96EC77149571AE89F82764C86684D047DE03C [3], > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4], > > * source code tag "release-0.5.2-incubating-rc2" [5], > > > > [1] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12322822&version=12346606 > > > > [2] > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hudi/hudi-0.5.2-incubating-rc2/ > > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/hudi/KEYS > > > > [4] > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehudi-1019 > > > > [5] > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/tree/release-0.5.2-incubating-rc2 > > > > > > A release validation script is available in master for running usual > > checks. To run this > > > > - git clone g...@github.com:apache/incubator-hudi.git > > - cd incubator-hudi/scripts > > - ./release/validate_staged_release.sh --release=0.5.2 --rc_num=2 > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. The vote will pass if a > > majority of at least three +1 IPMC votes are cast. > > > > Best, > > > > vino > > >
