Hi, > And on the opinion of the community for joining ASF, we have a slack > channel about how to set up the foundation(it is private...), not sure if > it is OK to post the message there out, but anyway, since this mailing list > is public, we can post this thread into the channel, and if there are > people who have concerns they can show up here.
That a good idea. One of the things that may need to change is to move conversation off that private slack channel and into the open once you start incubating. > And on the initial committers, the plan is to invite more people during the > incubating time. I’d strongly suggest you add more people to that initial list, there’s a chance the proposal may not be accepted by the IPMC because of that, but I’d like to hear what other IPMC members think about that before deciding. > In the past NuttX has some rules about the architecture, > coding, etc, but since there is only one committer, you do not need to tell > these rules to everyone as you can just reject the patch which break the > rules. Just because people have a commit bit doesn’t mean they have to commit code, you can apply social rules rather than technological ones, but a RTC (review then commit) workflow process (rather than CTR) is also likely to help here. > As now we will give more people the commit permission, we want to > make sure that all the committers know the rules and want to follow the > rules. > > https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/nuttx/src/master/INVIOLABLES.txt Thanks for that link. I noticed one other thing in there that NuttX name is trademarked. Is the project willing too hand over that trademark to the ASF? Thanks, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
