If SIGNA started as a university project, which is likely, I think the university should sign SGA.
I'm a mentor of Nemo (donated from a university project). I helped the Nemo community file SGA. Best, Gon On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I understand correctly, anytime software is brought into Apache as part > of the incubating process there must be documentation from the previous > owner of that software stating that they are donating it to Apache. > Without that Apache's ownership of the code is not clear. Justin, Dave, > others, please correct me if this understanding is wrong. > > And clearly there was code imported into Apache when Singa entered the > incubator, since an existing github link (now defunct) is referenced in > Singa's incubator proposal[1]. > > So I don't believe that an affirmation from PPMC that no docs are necessary > is sufficient. I believe we need a code grant from whoever owned that code > previously. > > Alan. > > 1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/SingaProposal see > the section on initial source. > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 12:29 AM Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > The PPMC reached a conclusion on the discussion [1] that there is no > need > > > for SGA. > > > > The link referred to doesn't give a reason why one is not required. Why > > was it decided that it wasn’t needed? Even if it not required (which I’m > > not 100% sure that is the case), would it be difficult to get one? If so > > why is that? > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > -- Byung-Gon Chun
