Hi,

[IPMC vote mail did not displayed as a separate mail thread than dev@ mail.
I've just realized it. So, that's why I send my vote after your reminder.]

+1 from me.

 I checked:

- Incubating in name
- Disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Code compiles and tests successfully run

Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI

17 Ağu 2019 Cmt, saat 02:54 tarihinde Joshua Poore <poor...@apache.org>
şunu yazdı:

> Hi IPMC—
>
> Just a reminder: please VOTE on Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating)
> v2.0.2
>
> We need +3 binding VOTE from Incubator having met the VOTE requirements on
> dev@
>
> Note that we have addressed the omission of the disclaimer files from .bin
> distribution packages Justin discovered, with no commits needed to fix. See
> below.
>
> As this is a security-related patch, attention to this VOTE is much
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Josh
>
> > On Aug 14, 2019, at 11:10 PM, Joshua Poore <poor...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > General@
> >
> > Following Justin’s comment below—Disclaimer missing from .bin release
> packages—I have repackaged release candidate #1 to include Disclaimers and
> pushed to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/flagon/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/flagon/>.
> >
> > As this issue was a file omission and did not affect source or build
> artifacts, the commit reference used for voting in dev@ have not changed,
> nor have git tags for the release candidate. .bin packages now include our
> Disclaimer.
> >
> > As a matter of good practice I have re-evaluated the repackaged release
> candidate against the following:
> >
> > [ x ] Build and Unit Tests Pass
> > [ x ] Integration Tests Pass
> > [ x ] "Incubating" in References to Project and Distribution File Names
> > [ x ] Signatures and Hashes Match Keys
> > [ x ] DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE Files in Source and Binary Release
> Packages
> > [ x ] DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE are consistent with ASF and
> Incubator Policy
> > [ x ] CHANGELOG included with release distribution
> > [ x ] All Source Files Have Correct ASF Headers
> > [ x ] No Unexpected Binary Files in Source Release Packages
> >
> > Please feel free to evaluate as you VOTE. See the thread below for the
> interim summary of VOTEs on dev@
> >
> > VOTE details follow:
> >
> > Please VOTE on the Apache Flagon (Incubating) 2.0.2 Release Candidate # 1
> >
> > This VOTE has passed successfully within the Apache Flagon community. We
> are now posting the VOTE on general@ as required by Apache Release
> Management policies.
> >
> > Interim RESULT on dev@ are as follows:
> >
> > [+1] 7
> > Joshua Poore
> > Rob Foley (`Confused`)
> > Laura Mariano
> > Furkan Kamaci*
> > Arthi Vezhavendan
> > Tim Allison*
> > Dave Meikle*
> >
> > [0] 0
> >
> > [-1]
> >
> > *Binding IPMC/PPMC Mentor VOTE
> >
> > The VOTE thread on dev@ can be found here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1d0efb2a17b1b1a3bb83a6bf882f994000f7d9db316f8b244db54076@%3Cdev.flagon.apache.org%3E
> <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1d0efb2a17b1b1a3bb83a6bf882f994000f7d9db316f8b244db54076@%3Cdev.flagon.apache.org%3E
> >
> >
> > VOTE details follow:
> >
> > About Flagon: http://flagon.incubator.apache.org/ <
> http://flagon.incubator.apache.org/> <http://flagon.incubator.apache.org/
> <http://flagon.incubator.apache.org/>>
> >
> > This Patch release includes :
> >
> >       • Updates to package.json and package-lock.json to resolve
> downstream Prototype Pollution vulnerabilities in dev dependencies
> >       • Updates to package.json and package-lock.json to modernize
> deprecated npm modules
> >       • Minor updates to README documentation for UserALE.js' Example
> Test Utilities.
> >
> > We solved 11 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLAGON/versions/12345954 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLAGON/versions/12345954><
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLAGON/versions/12345954 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLAGON/versions/12345954>>
> >
> > Git source tag (43de2fc1e1c5d5e1a83119a91947f7bbe6d313f3):
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-flagon-useralejs/releases/tag/2.0.2-RC1-08_06_2019
> <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-flagon-useralejs/releases/tag/2.0.2-RC1-08_06_2019>
> <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-flagon-useralejs/releases/tag/2.0.2-RC1-08_06_2019
> <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-flagon-useralejs/releases/tag/2.0.2-RC1-08_06_2019
> >>
> >
> > Staging repo: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/flagon/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/flagon/>
> >
> > Source Release Artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/flagon/apache-flagon-useralejs-incubating-2.0.2-RC1/
> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/flagon/apache-flagon-useralejs-incubating-2.0.2-RC1/>
>
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using F937rFAE3FCADF6E):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/flagon/KEYS <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/flagon/KEYS>
> >
> > Reference the UserALE.js testing framework to assist in your unit and
> integration tests:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLAGON/UserALE.js+Testing+Framework
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLAGON/UserALE.js+Testing+Framework
> >
> >
> > Link to Successful Jenkins Build(s):
> https://builds.apache.org/job/useralejs-ci/91/ <
> https://builds.apache.org/job/useralejs-ci/91/>
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows:
> >
> > [ ] +1, let's get it released!!!
> > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
> > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
> >
> > Thank you to everyone that is able to VOTE as well as everyone that
> contributed to Apache Flagon 2.0.0
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Josh
> >
> >> On Aug 14, 2019, at 8:27 AM, Joshua Poore <poor...@me.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Justin,
> >>
> >> Please clarify your VOTE. Are we at -1 or 0 from you? If its a 0 -
> "consider fixing a few issues”. I can easily roll a new release with
> DISCLAIMERS in bin push as new release package so that this issue can be
> vetted prior to release, but doesn’t require another VOTE altogether.
> >>
> >> Josh
> >>
> >>> On Aug 13, 2019, at 11:58 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> +1 (binding) on the source release, but sorry it’s -1 (binding) for
> the binaries as they are missing the DISCLAIMER file [2]
> >>>
> >>> You might want to consider using a checklist when checking releases
> [1]. Also when voting on release it a good idea to list what you checked
> rather than just saying +1.
> >>>
> >>> I checked:
> >>> - incubating in name
> >>> - signatures and hashes fine
> >>> - DISCLAIMER in source but not in binary releases
> >>> - LICENSE and NOTICE fine
> >>> - all source files have ASF headers
> >>> - no unexpected binary files in source release
> >>>
> >>> There also no need to put the KEYS fine inside the release, it's sort
> of a bit late to find it there after you unzipped it :-)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Justin
> >>>
> >>> 1.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> >>> 2. https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to