You have your 3 +1 Votes! We can discuss messaging on dev@tuweni
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 2:04 PM, Antoine Toulme <anto...@toulme.name> wrote: > > I’m not quite sure what to do. If I don’t hear by tomorrow I’ll close this > vote as passing. > >> On Jun 27, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:34 AM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>>> I see a lot of "oh no. a bad file". What is the takeaway from that? "The >>>> IPMC thinks we should not release.” >>> >>> Has anyone voted -1? Nope. And even if they did a -1 vote is not a veto. >>> >> >> Great. Semantics. "But I didn't really say veto." >> >> Your "not allowed" is read as a veto by any reasonably-minded person. If >> you think it should NOT be read as -1, then put a +1 into your message. >> That did not happen. So it is NOT read as +1 for the podling. I added my +1 >> as the third. Mostly to get it over with, and (honestly:) for some spite >> about the whole process. >> >> Look. Clearly this discussion is about rulesmithing to keep the status quo. >> Carry on. >> >> Maybe I should say you're being an ass about the whole process. :-) >> >> -g >> >> ps. per your rules [1], I put a smiley on that sentence, so it doesn't mean >> anything. >> [1] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201906.mbox/%3CA2A7580A-20DA-4894-9590-14D563C3D0E0%40me.com%3E > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
