Hi, > I was providing the converse: has the IPMC been told *not* to make podling > releases?
For ones that don’t comply with release policy? Yes they have. > I'm stipulating that "podling release" != "Foundation release", so > different policies apply. That’s the first time I’ve head it put that way. The IPMC is a PMC and make’s those releases. it seem odd they as a TLP don’t have to comply to policy, without the boards approval, especially if that not documented anywhere. > The disclaimer says "the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF”. Which is a little vague and doesn’t IMO explicitly say anything about releases. But rather than disagreeing about this why don’t we get it changed / confirmed by that the current board that this is the case? I for one are uncomfortable that the legal protections may not apply to IPMC members (and podlings involved) if we don’t follow release policy. Thanks, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
