> On the one side we have lengthy discussions about non-mentors from 
> resisting to interfere, but on the other hand podlings are begging for 
> such "interference".
> Guess there are always two sides of the discussion.


I politely disagree with you Chris.

What I raised was that cold interference can be damaging to some podlings 
during their first release attempt.

For the IPMC to endorse diversity and make the Incubator a safe and inclusive 
space it needs to accept that every podling community is different. Many 
communities will be perfectly fine with some armchair quarterbacking, 
appreciating the knowledge that's ultimately being shared and offered. Other 
communities will find it quickly overwhelming, unwelcoming and de-motivating.

I do not think there's two sides to this discussion, but rather an opportunity 
for us to assume and accept such differences.

Zipkin, like all podlings, will seek the input of the elders of the Incubator. 
But let them stub their toe a few times first, by themselves.

regards,
Mick

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to