I see nothing wrong w/ Cava and see no need to change it, esp before incubation.
> On Feb 18, 2019, at 11:40 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:52 PM Michael Wall <mjw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Interesting proposal. I would be interested in helping. Seems like you >> don't need anymore mentors so I can volunteer in any capacity you need. >> >> I think you are going to have trouble with the name though as >> https://cava.com/ is a great restaurant. >> >> > Sorry for the late reply - but that's not how naming works. I would > suggest that the proposed podling works with their champion to figure out > if the name needs to be changed before incubation. This isn't typically > how we do it. > > Typically, a name needs to be in a related field. If there was something > called "Cava" that also dealt with Blockchain or databases or similar, then > the name "Cava" would be an issue. Just because a restaurant chain is > named Cava doesn't mean it's not a suitable name. > > John > > >> Mike >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:36 PM Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> Hi - >>> >>> I would also be happy to volunteer as a Mentor to this podling. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >>> >>>> On Feb 5, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> I would like to volunteer as an additional mentor. >>>> >>>> Kenn >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:57 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Nice proposal. Just a couple of comments. >>>>> >>>>>> The project is well established and counts 2 active committers. Some >>>>> contributions were made from the community. >>>>> >>>>> Being that small may be a concern, the ASF prefers project with a >>>>> community around them, but it’s not always a barrier to entry see for >>>>> example Apache PLC4X. >>>>> >>>>>> Blockchain protocol developers organize well in communities, and some >>>>> lively discussions take place over Twitter, Gitter, Telegram. >>>>> >>>>> At the ASF all decisions need to be made on the mailing list not on >> any >>>>> external platform mentioned above. Would the project be OK with moving >>>>> discussions to a mailing list and having them in an asynchronous >> manner? >>>>> >>>>>> We will remain in incubation for a period of no less than a year so >> we >>>>> can properly invest and build a community of users, contributors and >>>>> committers around our goals. >>>>> >>>>> Most projects take more than a year to graduate, two years is usual >> but >>>>> some projects do take longer. Is the project OK with that and will >> your >>>>> mentors stay around for that long? >>>>> >>>>>> '''Initial Committers''' >>>>>> >>>>>> Antoine Toulme (toulmean at apache dot org) * >>>>> >>>>> Seem odd to only list one initial committer, all initial committer s >> are >>>>> on the PPMC and you would need a minimum of 3 active people. The IPMC >>>>> generally likes to see 5. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Justin >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
