My understanding is that only source-code releases are official releases. Binaries are just a convenience and not official, so I don't think you have to worry about making images available via DockerHub, even if that is the primary way most people install.
Dave On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 1:00 PM lewis john mcgibbney <lewi...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi general@, > Over at the SDAP podling we are currently involved in a bit of a situation > regarding the use of Dockerhub in our development and release management. > The primary mechanism for the deployment of SDAP’s NEXUS component is > Docker. It is therefore necessary for us to have available Docker images > which can be consumed by people trying to consume and deploy the SDAP > software. > The issue we have run into however is that the availability of Docker > images in Dockerhub appears to be in violation of Apache release policy. Is > this true for all images e.g. tagged and version controlled, hosted within > Dockerhub or is it acceptable for us to publish version controlled images > in Dockerhub? > Can anyone share experiences facilitating the use of Dockerhub throughout > development cycles and for staging release candidates which include Docker > artifacts? > Thank you > -- > http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc >
