Hi Chris,

yes, you got it right.
We do not care about "how does this message get from this processing node to 
that".
We "transpile" the higher level input into a DAG which can then run on 
basically every streaming engine (I agree, we do NOT need yet another one), in 
that sense it is a bit like Apache Beam.
Thus, I do not see it as a contender to Edgent but more as a complementary, 
because edgents focus is more the engine and Cloud Communication and CRUNCHs 
focus is more of "what exactly does the pipeline do".

Julian

Am 14.12.18, 11:54 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:

    Hi Julian,
    
    For me it always felt like crunch can't directly be compared to the other 
"streaming engines" as I see it as a bundle of a streaming engine and a higher 
level framework for doing typical industry operations on top of that.
    
    I think the higher level library should actually be able to run on top of 
any of the other streaming engines we have. Does such a split make sense, or 
did I get something wrong? Perhaps it would make sense to evaluate Edgents 
stream processing and eventually merge in improvements. I don't see a need 
multiple edge stream frameworks especially if we have to revive the existing 
one.
    
    I think an engine for higher level functions on top of a streaming engine 
of choice would be a great addition, because adding such logic to only one of 
the existing seems to be a waste.
    
    Chris
    
    Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen
    
    ________________________________
    From: Julian Feinauer <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>
    Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 11:11:40 AM
    To: general@incubator.apache.org
    Subject: Hello World / CRUNCH Framework
    
    Hi all,
    
    I just joined the incubator ML and wanted to present myself and possibly 
also start a discussion about a software project we developed in the past.
    But first things first. My name is Julian Feinauer and I come from Germany 
where I run two “start-up” companies where we work a lot on the “industrial 
IoT” topics, data science and processing of “larger amounts of data”. We love 
open source and so we love the ASF. Most notably, I closely follow the Apache 
Calcite project and hopefully find some time soon to contribute a bit more than 
in the last monts. Futhermore, I am engaged in the (incubating) PLC4X project 
as (P)PMC and in the  (incubating) Edgent project where I try to “revive” the 
community as new (P)PMC together with Christopher Dutz.
    
    Now to the real topic. Over the last 3 years I started to develop a 
“Framework/Library” (currently a set of jars) to facilitate processing of 
timeseries data. The focus is mostly on processing of data from test stands, 
e.g., automotive tests, driving profiles and so on. Furthermore, in the recent 
year we added a lot of functionality for processing of “industrial data”. This 
means that we want to make it easy to analyze things like “how long did the 
machine spend in this state”, “when are the following set of bits set” or 
“nofity when the following conditions is true for the first time”.
    It is a bit technical and I don’t want to go too deep into it, but 
generally speaking we try to introduce the “right” semantics to answer the 
typical questions when analyzing machine or test data. This project is called 
“CRUNCH” and we are in the process of making it open source (will be moved to a 
public github repo in this year) under the Apache 2.0 License.
    
    As there can be seen a close relationship to other (incubating or TLP) 
projects we are thinking about if this project could fit into the incubator. 
Some examples for Apache projects that we see as “related” are Apache Flink 
(which we can use as the Streaming Engine to process the stream), (incubating) 
Edgent which we also can support as Streaming Engine and where we try to find a 
suitable project goal and community currently as some of the (P)PMC members 
retired or went inactive. Finally, CRUNCH has a very natural fit with PLC4X 
because it can directly process the data gathered form PLCs (and in fact we are 
already using it in some of our projects that way). I had several discussions 
with some of the (P)PMCs of PLC4X, namely Sebastian Rühl and Christpher Dutz wo 
encouraged me to introduce the project to the incubator because they also see 
some potential for the project to enrich the OSS ecosystem with regards to edge 
/ stream processing of (I)IoT data.
    
    So please feel free to ask questions or discuss your view on this topic as 
I would like to find out if this project could fit in the Apache Ecosystem and 
the Incubator or not.
    
    Thank you already!
    Julian
    

Reply via email to