On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:10 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 03/09/18 03:32, Jun Liu wrote:
>
> <snip/>
>
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > [X] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Notes:
> ======
>
> Hash and signature match.
>
> Source zip matches Git tag (apart from expected differences of
> .gitignore and Maven wrapper)
>
> Builds and all tests except one pass.
>
>
> Issues from previous RC still present in this RC:
> =================================================
>
> The sha512 hashes are missing the '*' marker that indicates they are
> hashes for binary files rather than text files. Trivial issue. New RC
> not required.
>
>
> New issues
> ==========
>
> Tests seem to expect 127.0.0.2 to be a valid IP. If this is the case,
> consider documenting the requirements to run the tests somewhere obvious
> in the source tree. Trivial issue. New RC not required.
>
> I see the following test failures:
>   Oracle Java 8 update 181
>   Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS (fully patched)
>   Maven 3.5.4
>
> This fails consistently for me:
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test set: com.alibaba.dubbo.config.AbstractInterfaceConfigTest
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tests run: 38, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.119
> sec <<< FAILURE! - in com.alibaba.dubbo.config.AbstractInterfaceConfigTest
> checkApplication1(com.alibaba.dubbo.config.AbstractInterfaceConfigTest)
> Time elapsed: 0.006 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<10[0]> but was:<10[]>
>         at
>
> com.alibaba.dubbo.config.AbstractInterfaceConfigTest.checkApplication1(AbstractInterfaceConfigTest.java:90)
>
> I note that this test has been observed to fail for other community
> members in earlier RCs.
>

Yes, it's true, we've fixed it on 2.6.x branch, and will be in next
release, 2.6.4, but not in 2.6.3.

check the commit:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/commit/93d2eb674b094ee4feee0ef1e46096098c5a22b4


> I can recreate this failure on the command line but not in an IDE.
>
> Whether this failure is significant enough to halt the release is
> something for those more knowledgeable about Dubbo than I to decide.
>

This is the result of mutual influence of unit test cases, not the
functional problem. So IMO, this release could be go ahead. What do other
people think?


>
>
> Mark
>

Reply via email to